The Pause Is the Point

By Rita Okonkwo · The Craft

Ask someone to stop for two full seconds after an important line and most people do not manage it. They get partway there and the discomfort wins. Then they watch the recording back and are surprised: the pause they experienced as an eternity reads as confidence. It reads as deliberate.

That gap, between how a silence feels from the inside and how it sounds from the outside, is most of what there is to know about pausing. The rest is where to put one and how long to hold it.

The gap between inside and outside

A pause always feels longer to the speaker than to the audience. You are standing in front of people with your heart rate up and nothing happening. They are still processing the sentence you just finished. You are in dead air; they are still in the previous moment.

That asymmetry means your instinct for pause length is wrong, and it is wrong in one direction. Which is convenient, because the correction is simple: whatever feels right, hold it a little longer than feels comfortable, then check the recording.

What the research says pauses are

Pauses are not random gaps. Frieda Goldman-Eisler, whose work in the 1950s to 1970s founded the study of pausing, found that in read speech the silences fall overwhelmingly at grammatical boundaries: the ends of sentences and clauses.1 In spontaneous speech many of them land inside clauses instead, where the speaker is still planning what comes next. One kind of pause marks structure for the listener. The other kind shows the speaker thinking.

A later large-scale study measured thousands of silent pauses in read speech across five European languages and found they cluster into rough families by length: very brief ones under about a fifth of a second, medium ones up to about a second, and long ones beyond that.2 The medium pause is the ordinary comma and full stop of speech. The long pause is the one a listener notices as a pause, and it is the one nervous speakers cut short.

What a pause does for the listener

The best evidence that a pause helps comes from memory tests. In one study, listeners heard sentences in which a target word was sometimes preceded by a silent hesitation. Later, they were better at recognising the words that had come after a pause.3 The silence appears to raise attention for what follows it.

Another study told the same story to listeners with and without "uh" and "um" scattered through it. People who heard the version with filled pauses remembered the plot better, and the benefit did not come from interruptions in general: coughs dropped in at the same points did not help.4 An earlier experiment found that hearing "uh" sped up recognition of the word that followed it.5

None of that is a case for filling your talk with "um". It is a case for the moment of delay itself. A listener treats a break in fluency as a signal that something worth attention is coming. A clean, deliberate silence gives them the same signal without the noise.

Four jobs a pause does

It marks importance. Nothing signals "that line mattered" more cheaply than silence after it. Volume and emphasis are easy to overuse, and audiences learn to discount them. Silence costs the speaker something, so it reads as sincere.

It gives the audience room to finish thinking. A point does not land when you say it. It lands a beat later, when the listener has assembled it. Talk over that beat and the point never fully arrives.

It kills filler. "Um" and "you know" are rarely a vocabulary problem. They are a speaker filling a gap they are not comfortable leaving empty. Get comfortable with the silence and much of the filler goes with it.

It resets the room. After a tangent, a laugh or a technical hiccup, two seconds of silence is the fastest way to signal that you are back and the audience should be too.

Three places to put one

If you only ever pause in three spots, use these:

  1. Before you start. Walk up, stop, look at the room, then begin. This is the hardest one and the one that changes the most.
  2. After the claim. State the thing your talk exists to argue, then stop. Let it sit.
  3. Before the answer. In Q&A, a beat before you answer reads as considering the question. Answering instantly reads as having a script.

Where a pause backfires

A pause works because it contrasts with what surrounds it. Pause after every sentence and the contrast disappears; the talk starts to sound halting rather than deliberate. And a pause in the middle of a clause, where the listener is waiting for the rest of the grammar, reads as a lost thought rather than an emphasis. Goldman-Eisler's distinction is the useful test here: put the pauses you control at the boundaries, and let the ones inside a sentence be rare.

Practising it

The drill is uncomfortable and short. Take a paragraph you know well. Deliver it and pause for a full three seconds at each full stop. Three, not two. Record it.

You will dislike it while you do it. On playback it will sound close to normal, and slightly more authoritative than you usually sound. That gap between the doing and the hearing is the whole lesson, and once you have felt it you will stop trusting your in-the-moment sense of how long a silence is.

Then do it again at a normal pace, keeping just the three pauses above. That is the version to take into a real room.

References

  1. Goldman-Eisler, F. (1972). Pauses, clauses, sentences. Language and Speech, 15(2), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383097201500201
  2. Campione, E., & Véronis, J. (2002). A large-scale multilingual study of silent pause duration. Speech Prosody 2002. https://doi.org/10.21437/speechprosody.2002-35
  3. MacGregor, L. J., Corley, M., & Donaldson, D. I. (2010). Listening to the sound of silence: disfluent silent pauses in speech have consequences for listeners. Neuropsychologia, 48(14), 3982–3992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.09.024
  4. Fraundorf, S. H., & Watson, D. G. (2011). The disfluent discourse: Effects of filled pauses on recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 65(2), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.03.004
  5. Fox Tree, J. E. (2001). Listeners’ uses of um and uh in speech comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 29(2), 320–326. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03194926

Go deeper: What is a pause?, The "140 Words a Minute" Number, and Why It’s the Wrong Target